{"id":21074,"date":"2024-03-08T15:13:26","date_gmt":"2024-03-08T04:13:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.anneskyvington.com.au\/?p=21074"},"modified":"2024-04-04T13:16:56","modified_gmt":"2024-04-04T02:16:56","slug":"__trashed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.anneskyvington.com.au\/__trashed\/","title":{"rendered":"For International Women’s Day:"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
I have republished this article by Sharon Crozier-De Rosa from \"The Conversation\" under a Creative Commons license. <\/pre>\n\n\n\nSharon Crozier-De Rosa<\/a>, University of Wollongong<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
In Western countries, feminist history is generally packaged as a story of \u201cwaves\u201d. The so-called first wave lasted from the mid-19th century to 1920. The second wave spanned the 1960s to the early 1980s. The third wave began in the mid-1990s and lasted until the 2010s. Finally, some say we are experiencing a fourth wave, which began in the mid-2010s and continues now.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The first person to use \u201cwaves\u201d was journalist Martha Weinman Lear, in her 1968 New York Times article, The Second Feminist Wave<\/a>, demonstrating that the women\u2019s liberation movement was another \u201cnew chapter<\/a> in a grand history of women fighting together for their rights\u201d. She was responding to anti-feminists\u2019 framing of the movement as a \u201cbizarre historical aberration<\/a>\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Some feminists<\/a> criticise the usefulness of the metaphor. Where do feminists who preceded the first wave sit? For instance, Middle Ages feminist writer Christine de Pizan<\/a>, or philosopher Mary Wollstonecraft<\/a>, author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman<\/a> (1792).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Does the metaphor of a single wave overshadow<\/a> the complex variety of feminist concerns and demands? And does this language exclude the non-West<\/a>, for whom the \u201cwaves\u201d story is meaningless?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Despite these concerns, countless feminists continue to use<\/a> \u201cwaves\u201d to explain their position in relation to previous generations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n